Privatizing Warren County’s Board of Commissioners?

A drama in federal court involving a tiny township in Indiana County has alarming ramifications for the upcoming election of Warren County commissioners.

Pennsylvania General Energy Company, LLC vs. Grant Township

Injection Well

A drama in federal court involving a tiny township in Indiana County has alarming ramifications for the upcoming election of Warren County commissioners.

On April 4th, the Warren Times Observer ran a front-page story about how Warren-based Pennsylvania General Energy (PGE) won their law suit against Grant Township, a rural municipality of about 700 people. 

When PGE proposed converting a gas well in the Township into an injection well for disposal of oil and gas wastewater, the people of Grant Township—all of whom get their drinking water from private wells—voted for a Community of Bill of Rights that prohibited injecting radioactive wastewater into the hydraulically-fractured strata beneath their water table. For the Township, the Home Rule Municipal Charter was their last best hope to protect their drinking water from possible contamination.

According to the Times Observer article, Federal Judge Susan Paradise Baxter ruled in PGE’s favor, agreeing that PGE was due $600,000 for lawyer fees—more than four times the annual operating budget of the Township! But PGE, in an apparent act of mercy, voluntarily reduced their claim to $102,978, which Judge Baxter effusively noted would “avoid bankrupting Grant Township.”

NOTE: The Times Observer article did not mention that the reduced financial award may yet cause the Township’s financial ruin. Nor did the article mention that the lawyer fees claimed by PGE would likely be substantially recovered through a tax write-off. But perhaps most importantly to Judge Baxter and PGE, their trumpeted act of apparent altruism avoided the PR debacle that would have resulted had they summarily forced the Township into immediate bankruptcy.

In what might be described as judicial outrage, Judge Baxter not only punished Supervisors (and voters) of Grant Township for their brazen attempt at democratic self-government, but the Judge made a glaring example of the Township, meant as a stiff warning to any other municipality considering asserting local unalienable citizen rights above the artificial legal rights of “corporate persons.” After all, even in the face of unacceptable risk to the health of its citizens, what township or borough will dare to defend itself against a deep-pocketed business if federal court-ordered financial ruin is certain?

Also, to make sure that no other non-profit, do-gooding attorneys will have the temerity to represent a municipality in a future community rights case, Judge Baxter ordered both CELDF attorneys to pay $52,000 to PGE and referred one to the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

NOTE: Fortunately for all of us, human nature is such that many of us (including non-profit attorneys and the municipalities of which we are a part) fight even harder in the face of court-condoned corporate rule.

PGE Commissioners vs. People of Warren County

Court House, Warren County Pennsylvania

This courtroom battle between Grant Township and PGE matters to the voters of Warren County for many reasons, but one reason in particular must be addressed by November, because two of the four candidates running for commissioner in the upcoming election are PGE employees, both of whom apparently plan to remain employed at PGE while simultaneously serving as county commissioners. 

If the three candidates who won the most votes in the party primaries are elected, the next Warren County Board of Commissioners will include PGE Chief Financial Officer Patricia Durbin, and PGE Senior Systems Engineer Paul Giannini–employees of the company that spent $600,000 to bulldoze democracy in a small, cash-strapped municipality that is remarkably similar to the twenty-six small, cash-strapped municipalities in Warren County.

In a May 18th article in the Times Observer, Ms. Durbin said of her arrangement to keep her position with PGE, “I had the pleasure of being endorsed by the [PGE] CEO to give me the liberty to do what I need to do. [I] also had the pleasure of the [PGE] owners both supporting me in this campaign role and financially backing my campaign.” 

Is this gracious support for Ms. Durbin simple largess by the owners of PGE?

If the two PGE “employee-candidates” are elected, imagine the possible consequences. What would happen after the election if an oil and gas company—perhaps even PGE—proposes one or more additional injection wells in Warren County? Or what happens when an oil and gas company proposes the resumption of spreading oil and gas well wastewater on municipal roads for dust abatement? Or what happens if an oil and gas company proposes any action that might financially benefit PGE? Who among those PGE “Employee-Commissioners” would stand for the rights and interests of Warren County citizens against the legal threat posed by a wealthy “corporate person” willing to lawyer up against the will of the people. . . especially if that wealthy company happens to be the Employee-Commissioners’ primary employer?

In a future scenario in which a Board decision might financially benefit PGE, would the two PGE commissioners recuse themselves? If so, even that could benefit PGE, since that would eliminate the required two-thirds quorum for the Board to act, thereby stymying citizen action at the County level—a result that could be just as valuable as voting to a company trying to fast track a controversial project.

The Bible says a person cannot serve two masters. If Ms. Durbin and Mr. Giannini win seats on the Board of Commissioners, who will they serve? The people of Warren County, or the owners of PGE?

Author: John Able

John is a retired Forest Service employee, where he worked as a wildland firefighter, public affairs officer, and technical writer. He lives with his family along a left-bank tributary of Conewango Creek in rural Warren County, Pennsylvania.

8 thoughts on “Privatizing Warren County’s Board of Commissioners?”

  1. Looks like a conflict of interest. If they were elected, could we trust them to recuse themselves from any discussion or decisions involving PG&E? Oh, that’s right. There are only 3 Commissioners. At least Jeff has proven himself to be honest, and to place the concerns of the voters front and center.

  2. David B Slater The Deep State now visible in Warren County. Always been here just not so bold.Could name names however; You All Know? Question? How do we define a conflict of interest? How Do We Define a Judge defending a Corporate Interest vs the Well Being of We The People? Quote” even in the face of unacceptable risk to the health of its citizens, what township or borough will dare to defend itself against a deep-pocketed business if federal court-ordered financial ruin is certain.” Danger Here Quote”When PGE proposed converting a gas well in the Township into an injection well for disposal of oil and gas wastewater, the people of Grant Township—all of whom get their drinking water from private wells—voted for a Community of Bill of Rights that prohibited injecting radioactive wastewater into the hydraulically-fractured strata beneath their water table. For the Township, the Home Rule Municipal Charter was their last best hope to protect their drinking water from possible contamination.” Write In David B Slater and Cut The Bovine Excrement! for GOD, Our Families, and Country under the Constitutional Republic as well as the State of Pennsylvania’s Constitution. As Well as the MATH!

  3. Since when and what law dictates that one cannot run for office because they work for a certain company? In a fair court, the judge follows the law. Just maybe PGE won because they were following the law. Imagine that!

    I’m going to take a wild guess and figure the water was to be injected into the Marcellus sands far below the drinking water aquafer and separated from drinking water by several hundred feet of solid rock. I’ll further guess and be willing to put my money up that the people that elected their commissioners and many of the persons that responded in this Facebook thread don’t have a clue about the science of what was really happening. I’m going to further guess that some eco-freak organization offered the township pro bono legal help and then left them hanging when they lost. The county initiated a law suit emotionally and not factually.

    I know some PGE personnel. They are smart. Do you really think they would intentionally inject water into an area that would hurt people? Do you suppose if those people are hurt, PGE could afford the lawsuits that would follow? Does PGE know the law and the science and are willing to put their money where their mouth is in court and withstand the liability if they are wrong? In my opinion, yes.

    I think we could use smart businesspeople instead of uninformed politicians in our government.

    1. Yeah. No company has ever dumped anything toxic into the environment despite knowing it would make people sick or kill them.

  4. I am extremely concerned about the idea of two PGE employees retaining employment and taking positions as Commissioners in the County after the actions of PGE toward Grant Twp. A Chief Financial Officer and a Senior Systems Engineer are both highly compensated senior executive positions. That they intend to remain in those positions clearly indicates that they are loyal to PGE and, if PGE is subsidizing their campaigns, then they are indebted to the company which will expect a return on their investment. When these corporations make these expenditures, they do it for their own interests, not the peoples. I wouldn’t think I would have to say that but I guess I do. As for the previously mentioned idea that PGE followed the law, that means nothing but that the law is corrupt. Remember, slavery, debt bondage, and child labor were all once entirely legal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.